What should the tie-breaks be? Wins then head to head, or head to head then wins? Could change the seating next week.

Here are the NHL tiebreaker rules.

1. The fewer number of games played (i.e., superior points percentage).
2. The greater number of games won.
3. The greater number of points earned in games between the tied clubs. If two clubs are tied, and have not played an equal number of home games against each other, points earned in the first game played in the city that had the extra game shall not be included. If more than two clubs are tied, the higher percentage of available points earned in games among those clubs, and not including any "odd" games, shall be used to determine the standing.
4. Goal differential

I don't see any reason to reinvent the wheel.

How about including the number of two handers across peoples heads? 2 points
How about letting an asshole play again when JB said he couldn't? 2 points
How about missed calls by Bruce the cocksucker? 2 points
How about the best goalie in the league (even with KD) playing defense? 4 points
How about fighting, without a cage, a tall guy with helmet glued on? 4 points
How about Dan Gunnings cooking? 4 points
How about Bender's chest muscles? 2 points

Darkness II wins!!!!!!

Head to Head first, obviously the better team, then wins.

I agree with the Rocket...Darkness II wins!

The cheap shots are coming fast and furrious from Carter in recent weeks.

Nevermind, maybe I read that wrong. I'm still trying to sober up from my double header of drinking and heckling.

...and I ment furious.

Dammit Art, we need an edit button for the posts since I don't seem to spell very well.